Ayurveda vs Allopathy: Can they co-exist in employee health insurance?

Is Ayurveda better than Allopathy? Explore the Ayurveda vs Allopathy debate and how both can co-exist in employee health insurance plans.

Quick Summary

The Ayurveda vs Allopathy debate is gaining momentum in India’s healthcare. While Allopathy is widely accepted for acute care and emergencies, Ayurveda is gaining popularity for chronic conditions and preventive wellness. Public debates, legal rulings, and IMA pushback reflect the complexity of integrating both systems. In this blog, you’ll explore the key differences between Ayurveda and Allopathy, understand why this debate is gaining attention and see how each system plays a distinct role in healthcare.

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is best, medicine or Ayurvedic?

accordion icon

For quick symptom relief and acute conditions, modern medicine (Allopathy) is preferred. For holistic, root-cause healing and long-term wellness, Ayurvedic treatment may be more effective.

Which is better, Ayurveda or Allopathy?

accordion icon

Neither system is universally better. Allopathy is ideal for emergencies, infections, and surgeries, while Ayurveda excels in managing chronic lifestyle disorders, stress, and preventive care.

Can an Ayurvedic doctor practice Allopathy?

accordion icon

As per Section 15 of the Medical Council Act, 1956 and Section 17 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, AYUSH practitioners can prescribe modern (allopathic) medicines only if they are also enrolled on a State Medical Register as defined under the 1956 Act.

What are the disadvantages of Ayurvedic treatment?

accordion icon

Some drawbacks of Ayurveda include slower results, lack of standardized clinical research, risk of self-medication, and limited availability of NABH-accredited hospitals. It's essential to consult certified practitioners and avoid over-the-counter herbs without guidance.

A graphic showing a woman sitting on a chair with a laptop